Статья:

LEXICAL-SEMANTIC WORD GROUPS AND THEIR ROLE IN LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS

Конференция: CI Международная научно-практическая конференция «Научный форум: филология, искусствоведение и культурология»

Секция: Сравнительно-историческое, типологическое и сопоставительное языкознание

Выходные данные
Nasibova G.Sh. LEXICAL-SEMANTIC WORD GROUPS AND THEIR ROLE IN LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS // Научный форум: Филология, искусствоведение и культурология: сб. ст. по материалам CI междунар. науч.-практ. конф. — № 1(101). — М., Изд. «МЦНО», 2026.
Конференция завершена
Мне нравится
на печатьскачать .pdfподелиться

LEXICAL-SEMANTIC WORD GROUPS AND THEIR ROLE IN LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS

Nasibova Gulnara Shamaddin
Senior lecturer, Ganja State University, Azerbaijan, Ganja

 

Abstract. This study explores lexical-semantic word groups as a fundamental component of linguistic analysis. Lexical-semantic groupings represent systematic relationships among lexical units based on shared, contrasting, or hierarchically structured meanings. The article examines core types of lexical-semantic relations, including synonymy, antonymy, homonymy, polysemy, and semantic fields, within the framework of modern linguistic theory. Particular attention is given to the role of lexical-semantic groups in revealing the internal organization of the lexicon and their applications in lexicography, language teaching, and translation studies. The findings demonstrate that lexical-semantic word groups form a coherent semantic network reflecting both cognitive categorization and communicative function.

 

Keywords: lexicon, semantics, lexical-semantic groups, synonymy, antonymy, homonymy, polysemy, semantic fields.

 

Introduction

Language is a complex, multi-layered system in which meaning is not conveyed through isolated lexical units but emerges from systematic relationships among words. The vocabulary of any language reflects collective human experience, cultural values, and cognitive processes, making the lexicon one of the most dynamic and structurally significant components of linguistic organization. Consequently, the study of lexical meaning and its internal structuring occupies a central position in modern linguistic theory. Traditional approaches to lexicology often treated words as relatively independent units, focusing primarily on their form, origin, or dictionary definitions. However, contemporary linguistics increasingly recognizes that lexical items function within an interconnected semantic network. Words acquire meaning not only through direct reference to extralinguistic reality but also through their relations to other words within the lexical system. These relations include similarity, contrast, inclusion, and semantic extension, all of which contribute to the organization of the lexicon. One of the most productive frameworks for examining such relations is the concept of lexical-semantic word groups. Lexical-semantic groupings provide a systematic method for classifying vocabulary based on shared semantic features or specific types of semantic interaction. Through this approach, the lexicon is viewed as a structured system rather than an unordered inventory of lexical forms. This perspective allows linguists to identify semantic regularities and to explain how meaning is distributed and maintained across the lexical system. The relevance of lexical-semantic word groups extends beyond theoretical linguistics. In applied domains such as lexicography, language teaching, translation studies, and discourse analysis, an understanding of semantic relations among words is essential. For example, effective vocabulary instruction relies on presenting words within semantic networks rather than as isolated items, while accurate translation requires sensitivity to synonymic variation, antonymic contrast, and polysemous meaning structures. Moreover, the study of lexical-semantic relations contributes to broader cognitive and functional approaches to language. Semantic groupings reflect conceptual categorization processes and reveal how speakers organize knowledge and experience through language. Phenomena such as synonymy, antonymy, homonymy, and polysemy illustrate the interaction between linguistic form, meaning, and usage, highlighting the adaptive and economical nature of human language. The primary objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive analysis of lexical-semantic word groups and to examine their role in the organization of the lexicon. The study aims to classify the major types of lexical-semantic relations and to demonstrate their significance within both theoretical and applied linguistic contexts. By adopting a systemic perspective on lexical meaning, the article seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of how language structures meaning and facilitates effective communication.

Introduction

Lexicon and Semantics: Theoretical Background

The lexicon encompasses the total set of lexical items available to speakers of a language. It is dynamic in nature, constantly evolving in response to social, cultural, and technological change. Processes such as borrowing, word formation, and semantic shift contribute to lexical expansion and reorganization.

Semantics is the branch of linguistics concerned with the study of meaning. Lexical semantics, in particular, focuses on word meaning and the semantic relationships between lexical units. According to Saeed (2016), meaning is not an isolated property of individual words but emerges from systematic relations within the lexicon.

The interaction between lexicon and semantics results in a structured lexical-semantic system, which enables speakers to encode and interpret meaning efficiently.

The lexicon represents the totality of lexical units available in a given language and constitutes a central component of its linguistic system. Far from being a static repository of words, the lexicon is a dynamic and evolving structure shaped by historical, social, and cognitive factors. Processes such as lexical innovation, borrowing, semantic shift, and morphological productivity continuously reshape the vocabulary, reflecting changes in human experience and communicative needs.

From a theoretical perspective, the lexicon occupies a crucial position at the intersection of form and meaning. Lexical items encode conceptual content and function as the primary carriers of meaning in language. As a result, the study of the lexicon extends beyond simple word lists and requires systematic analysis of semantic structure and organization.

Semantics, as a branch of linguistics, is concerned with the study of meaning in language. It examines how meaning is constructed, interpreted, and represented at various levels, including lexical, phrasal, and sentential meaning. Lexical semantics, in particular, focuses on the meaning of individual words and the semantic relations that connect them. According to Saeed (2016), lexical meaning is inherently relational, emerging from a network of associations rather than existing in isolation.

Modern semantic theory recognizes that word meaning is influenced by both linguistic and extralinguistic factors. Cognitive approaches emphasize the role of conceptualization and categorization in shaping lexical meaning, while functional approaches highlight the influence of usage, context, and communicative purpose. These perspectives converge in viewing meaning as a flexible and context-sensitive phenomenon rather than a fixed set of features.

The interaction between lexicon and semantics gives rise to a structured lexical-semantic system. Within this system, words are organized according to shared semantic components, oppositional relationships, hierarchical structures, and patterns of semantic extension. Such organization enables speakers to process and produce language efficiently, as semantic relations facilitate lexical access and interpretation.

Theoretical models such as semantic field theory and componential analysis have contributed significantly to the understanding of lexical-semantic organization. Semantic field theory proposes that vocabulary is organized into interconnected domains of meaning, while componential analysis seeks to identify minimal semantic features that distinguish lexical items. Although these models differ in methodological focus, both underscore the systematic nature of lexical meaning.

In contemporary linguistics, the lexicon is increasingly viewed as an integrated system influenced by cognition, culture, and discourse. The study of lexical-semantic relations thus provides essential insight into how languages structure meaning and how speakers use lexical resources to represent reality. This theoretical foundation underpins the analysis of lexical-semantic word groups and highlights their significance within the broader framework of linguistic research.

Lexical-Semantic Word Groups: Definition and Features

Lexical-semantic word groups are sets of words united by shared semantic components or by specific types of semantic relations. These groupings reflect the internal organization of vocabulary and highlight systematic connections between lexical units.

Key features of lexical-semantic groups include semantic relatedness, structural coherence, functional relevance, and contextual dependency. As noted by Cruse (2004), such groups are not fixed entities but flexible networks that adapt to semantic change and language use.

The identification of lexical-semantic groups allows linguists to analyze vocabulary as an interconnected system rather than a collection of independent items.

Types of Lexical-Semantic Relations

Synonymy

Synonymy refers to the relationship between words with similar or nearly identical meanings. Absolute synonymy is rare; most synonyms differ in stylistic value, connotation, or distribution. For instance, synonyms often reflect distinctions in formality or emotional tone.

Synonymy contributes to expressive richness and enables speakers to select lexical items according to communicative intent. As Lyons (1995) argues, synonymy illustrates the multidimensional nature of meaning within the lexicon.

Antonymy

Antonymy denotes semantic opposition between lexical units. Antonyms may form binary pairs or represent gradable contrasts. This relationship plays a crucial role in structuring conceptual categories and expressing evaluation.

Antonymy supports logical organization in language and is frequently employed in argumentative and descriptive discourse (Murphy, 2003).

Homonymy

Homonymy occurs when two or more words share identical form but have unrelated meanings. Homonyms may coincide in pronunciation, spelling, or both. This phenomenon demonstrates the importance of contextual interpretation in meaning construction.

Although homonymy may lead to ambiguity, contextual and syntactic cues typically ensure successful communication (Crystal, 2008).

Polysemy

Polysemy refers to the presence of multiple related meanings within a single lexical item. These meanings are often connected through metaphorical or metonymic extension.

Polysemy represents a productive mechanism of lexical economy and semantic development, allowing languages to expand meaning without increasing lexical inventory (Saeed, 2016).

Semantic Fields

Semantic fields consist of lexical units related to a specific conceptual domain. Such groupings reflect cognitive categorization and are especially relevant in terminology studies and specialized discourse.

Semantic fields play a significant role in lexicography and language teaching by facilitating systematic vocabulary organization.

Linguistic and Applied Implications

Lexical-semantic word groups are essential for semantic modeling, lexicographic description, and discourse analysis. In applied linguistics, they support vocabulary instruction, translation accuracy, and contrastive language analysis.

A systematic understanding of lexical-semantic relations enhances communicative competence and promotes more precise language use across contexts.

Conclusion

Lexical-semantic word groups constitute a foundational element of linguistic structure. They reveal the systematic organization of the lexicon and demonstrate how meaning is constructed through interrelated semantic networks. The analysis of synonymy, antonymy, homonymy, polysemy, and semantic fields provides valuable insights into the cognitive and communicative dimensions of language. Consequently, lexical-semantic analysis remains a central area of inquiry in contemporary linguistic research.

 

References:
1. Cruse, D. A. (2004). Lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press.
2. Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.
3. Lyons, J. (1995). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
4. Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
5. Saeed, J. I. (2016). Semantics (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.